You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am working on segmenting specific sites on chromatin fibers (see images below). I have sparesaly annotated data, set up, and trained an nnUNet to recognize the interesting areas. However, I get very low accuracy (dice validation score 6%). Did I miss something while creating the masks with the BG being 0 and the foreground masks being 1? I read about the ignore label option and the partial loss, where the network omits the non-annotated sections: https://github.com/MIC-DKFZ/nnUNet/blob/master/documentation/ignore_label.md
Am I right that for this to work, I would need to have the non-labelled chromatin parts labelled as a different class, and I could give it the ignore flag? Could it be done without segmenting the chromatin itself and only considering the labelled parts in the loss function?
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Hi all,
I am working on segmenting specific sites on chromatin fibers (see images below). I have sparesaly annotated data, set up, and trained an nnUNet to recognize the interesting areas. However, I get very low accuracy (dice validation score 6%). Did I miss something while creating the masks with the BG being 0 and the foreground masks being 1? I read about the ignore label option and the partial loss, where the network omits the non-annotated sections: https://github.com/MIC-DKFZ/nnUNet/blob/master/documentation/ignore_label.md
Am I right that for this to work, I would need to have the non-labelled chromatin parts labelled as a different class, and I could give it the ignore flag? Could it be done without segmenting the chromatin itself and only considering the labelled parts in the loss function?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions