You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Describe the bug
In table 40 of mf6io.pdf, it says that the last term written to the MVR budget file is FW-RATE-TO-MVR
but the actual label written for this term is CONSTANT-TO-MVR.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
test_gwf_maw11.txt.txt
I started looking into this by creating a new test problem (attached); it seems there's a bit more going on than first anticipated. Will chat with the lead developers to try and figure out what's needed.
I think the table will also need to be amended with something to the effect: CONSTANT-TO-MVR 6 1/nmawwells Calculated flow from a multi-aquifer well with STATUS set to CONSTANT to the MVR Package. Only saved if MVR Package is used in the MAW Package. The multi-aquifer well number is written to (ID1) and (ID2).
Describe the bug
In table 40 of mf6io.pdf, it says that the last term written to the MVR budget file is FW-RATE-TO-MVR
but the actual label written for this term is CONSTANT-TO-MVR.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: