-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 34
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Elements Order #52
Comments
Out of the proposed algorithm choices, here is my ordered personal preferences:
|
Whilst Popularity makes sense in theory, it's essentially arbitrary, because unless someone keeps track of every immutable distro, project, and community, they can't know how popular everything is. I personally only keep up with Fedora Silverblue and Aeon, so I have no idea how popular VanillaOS or ChimeraOS are, for example. From my (biased) point of view, as long as Fedora Atomic (and uBlue), Aeon, and Nix are the top 3, I don't really mind what the order of the rest are, so feel free to re-order them if the randomness bothers you. |
Hello again @Dvlv !
Indeed
From there, I feel like popularity ranking should be avoided, unless we find a way to make it objective rather than subjective and arbitrary The only statistic source I know of is DistroWatch, but measuring the popularity of a distribution the amount of click on that website is definitely not good enough Maybe we should temporary eliminate that ranking algorithm choice for now, |
I don't see any need to make an official rule about where contributors should place things. This repo isn't exactly receiving hundreds of contributions, and I wouldn't want to make contributing too complex and put off people who wish to add things. If you want to re-order things, feel free, as long as you leave the aforementioned three at the top. |
About distributions, the base and the atomic tool used is also an important metric |
Maybe a table would be great for certain categories |
Currently, there is no defined order algorithm
The elements seems randomly ordered
I think it would be a good idea to define an element order, and state it, even if it stays "random"
Algorithm Choices
Steps
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: