Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Review modeling of StorageCluster #498

Open
agrare opened this issue Dec 17, 2019 · 2 comments
Open

Review modeling of StorageCluster #498

agrare opened this issue Dec 17, 2019 · 2 comments

Comments

@agrare
Copy link
Member

agrare commented Dec 17, 2019

Should this continue to be an EmsFolder subclass (which would imply it is strictly a grouping of child objects) or should it move towards an EmsCluster which brings DRS and provisioning implications

@agrare
Copy link
Member Author

agrare commented Dec 17, 2019

ref ManageIQ/manageiq#19534

@miq-bot miq-bot added the stale label Jun 11, 2020
@miq-bot
Copy link
Member

miq-bot commented Jun 11, 2020

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not been updated for at least 3 months.

If you can still reproduce this issue on the current release or on master, please reply with all of the information you have about it in order to keep the issue open.

Thank you for all your contributions! More information about the ManageIQ triage process can be found in the traige process documentation.

@gtanzillo gtanzillo added pinned and removed stale labels Jul 13, 2020
@Fryguy Fryguy added the size/l label May 3, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants