You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Reporter: springmeyer Date: 2011/09/15 - 23:34
In testing mapnik rendering against postgis I've played with using either BOX3D or GeomFromText to construct the geometry to use for bbox tests. I've noticed that using BOX3D is about 100 ms faster. Not sure if this is significant but just in case it might be faster I thought I would mention it (feel free to close). Mapnik code is here: http://trac.mapnik.org/browser/trunk/plugins/input/postgis/postgis_datasource.cpp#L360
And here was the simple benchmark (using the style from the foss4g2011 wms benchmark) in mapnik format:
Reporter: springmeyer
Date: 2011/09/15 - 23:34
In testing mapnik rendering against postgis I've played with using either BOX3D or GeomFromText to construct the geometry to use for bbox tests. I've noticed that using BOX3D is about 100 ms faster. Not sure if this is significant but just in case it might be faster I thought I would mention it (feel free to close). Mapnik code is here: http://trac.mapnik.org/browser/trunk/plugins/input/postgis/postgis_datasource.cpp#L360
And here was the simple benchmark (using the style from the foss4g2011 wms benchmark) in mapnik format:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: