We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
CQ('ax*bx + ay*by=0')
-(ax*bx + ay*by)
CQ('0=ax*bx + ay*by')
ax*bx + ay*by
These are both valid results, but they appear as different expressions which makes unit testing difficult.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We should probably implement a .equals method on nodes, which checks if their simplified and expanded forms are the same.
.equals
Sorry, something went wrong.
@zvxryb - This should be a pretty easy fix; I'll put it in the next patch. @bshlgrs - #112
No branches or pull requests
CQ('ax*bx + ay*by=0')
-(ax*bx + ay*by)
CQ('0=ax*bx + ay*by')
ax*bx + ay*by
These are both valid results, but they appear as different expressions which makes unit testing difficult.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: