chore: Bump @metamask/swaps-controller to 12.0.0

[mcmire]

Description

This PR upgrades @metamask/swaps-controller to 12.0.0.

The most notable change here is that the controller has been updated to mostly not rely on the global provider; instead networkClientId is passed to the various methods that need it.

See the full changelog here: TODO

Related issues

Fixes #12470.

Also see:

• https://github.com/MetaMask/swaps-controller/pull/347
• https://github.com/MetaMask/swaps-controller/issues/204

Manual testing steps

• Tap on the Swap button
• Select a destination token and proceed
• You should see new quotes

Screenshots/Recordings

The Swaps flow should work exactly like it does now.

Here is a video demonstrating fetching Swaps quotes:

Screen.Recording.2024-11-22.at.12.25.33.PM.mov

Pre-merge author checklist

• I’ve followed MetaMask Contributor Docs and MetaMask Mobile Coding Standards.
• I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability
• I’ve included tests if applicable
• I’ve documented my code using JSDoc format if applicable
• I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see labeling guidelines). Not required for external contributors.

Pre-merge reviewer checklist

• I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed).
• I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots.

[github-actions]

CLA Signature Action: All authors have signed the CLA. You may need to manually re-run the blocking PR check if it doesn't pass in a few minutes.

[socket-security]

New and removed dependencies detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎

Package	New capabilities	Transitives	Size	Publisher
npm/@metamask-previews/swaps-controller@11.0.0-preview-40be04506cf92f5e6a271eb90c96b4ddcf57dd5d	None	+2	1.09 MB	mcmire

🚮 Removed packages: npm/@metamask/[email protected]

View full report↗︎

[mcmire]

Need to add missing unit tests in order to make SonarCloud pass on this, but all of the existing unit tests should pass and you should be able to follow the manual testing steps listed in the PR description.

[sonarcloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
73.9% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud