Mechanism in validator to identify departures from recommendations for specifying versions

[GoogleCodeExporter]

With Issue 154, we are changing the set of optional messages used to define a 
project reference in a baseline and we are renaming several of the  methods.

We just can't deprecate the old messages, because we shouldn't have to change 
all of the old versions just to avoid deprecation warnings.

For the same reason we can't make them validation warnings ...

It almost seems that we need to be able to run a validator pass that identifies 
deprecated usages ...

For example using className: is only necessary of the name of the class is not 
the same as the project name with 'ConfigrationOf' prepended. Same test for 
file:. Then there are the cases where you should use load: instead of loads:, 
etc.

Perhaps, these validations should kick in only when a particular version is 
being validated (by default) with the option to run these validations  for all 
versions and nested configs ...

The implication is that this should be a separate class of validation issue ... 
perhaps Recommendations...

That would give us Warnings, Recommendations, Critical Warnings, and Errors 
with a mechanism for filtering in the results ...

Original issue reported on code.google.com by [email protected] on 26 Jan 2012 at 7:52

• Blocked on: about blessing: and others #154

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Not completely required to address this issue in 1.0-beta.32 ... will take a 
look when I hit the validator though 
(https://github.com/dalehenrich/metacello-work/issues/5)

Original comment by [email protected] on 19 May 2012 at 9:46

• Added labels: Milestone-1.0
• Removed labels: Milestone-1.0-beta.32