-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 648
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Availability of reinfection cases for the unvaccinated #201
Comments
Discrepancies; we need our own data to make better sense of things: https://youtu.be/6Gn5GtUpwQ0?t=272 |
Based on this scientific study, the reinfection cases only occurred around 0.33% which translated to a very low incidence. This is also supported by another study that had found natural immunity 13x stronger, robust and long-lasting compared to acquired immunity through a vaccine. This is the reason why reinfection cases rarely happened. |
This is not good: https://youtu.be/-Ia5l0p4gI4?t=150 . Does it transpire here as well? Hence no response until now? |
2 (no difference between immunities) vs. 1 (noticeable difference): https://youtu.be/E89taTH86_s?t=440 |
Undiscernable relationship (ourworldindata.org): https://youtu.be/HeSJWGSnN8A?t=945 |
Template for a proper study: https://youtu.be/gnB8Tep92Us?t=1445 |
Study on vitamin D3 vs. Covid-19 mortality rate: https://youtu.be/fbGug3rczx4?t=125 Simple enough for us to replicate using our own data, yet overwhelmingly impactful on shaping our future outlook towards Covid-19 endemicity. |
Sorry for the late reply. I'm quite busy with my works. Not have enough
time to concentrate on this issue until all my works are done.
…On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 7:08 AM jstumpin ***@***.***> wrote:
Study on vitamin D3 vs. Covid-19 mortality rate:
https://youtu.be/fbGug3rczx4?t=125
Simple enough for us to replicate using our own data, yet overwhelmingly
impactful for our future outlook on Covid-19 prevention.
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#201 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AV67XIVZYMUGGW5CPQZUKU3UMWBOVANCNFSM5FJQIX5Q>
.
Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS
<https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675>
or Android
<https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&referrer=utm_campaign%3Dnotification-email%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dgithub>.
|
Pfizer(82%) < Natural-Immunity(73%) < AstraZeneca(67%): https://youtu.be/64OTXmp3YRI Full excerpt from the paper reviewed in the video:
|
As of now, it is either zero or N/A. I don't believe it's the former. For completeness (so we may have finer granularity by breaking down immunity category into vaccine-immunity, natural-immunity and hybrid-immunity), kindly provide the necessary information. This will help shaping current SOPs as well as to give guidance for future vaccination programme.
Thank you.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: