-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 59
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[QUESTION] Long-term Support for Mobility-Database-Catalogs Repo vs. New Mobility Database API #654
Comments
I found this ticket which seems related: IIUC there is no long-term plan to deprecate CSV usage for end-consumers; but 'dynamic data' & CSV generation will move to mobility-feed-api? And then mobility-database-catalogs repo will only contain 'static' data (e.g. which feeds should be included in the Mobility DB dataset)? |
Hi @mil, Thanks for your continued support. The mobility-feed-api was introduced to support API consumers and also create a more robust internal maintenance process. We understand the importance of CSV as a source of information. As a long-term strategy, we are:
I was collecting my thoughts when I read your second comment. I'm glad that you found the related issue |
All the feeds will be in the new CSV(GTFS and GTFS-RT). Feeds that are "bulk" imported won't appear in the |
Great - thank you @davidgamez This does really clarify things. I'm really looking forward to the first version of the new CSV based on 779. And I'm also looking forward to the new feeds automatically imported sourced from NAS. |
The new Mobility Database API can provide much of the functionality of this repo (mobility-database-catalogs) & might potentially replace the existing CSV generation workflow. However, I'd note that from a business & end-developer perspective, consuming a CSV is often simpler to use & more pragmatic than integrating with a custom HTTP API for simple usecases.
As an end-user of Mobility Database's CSV (with an app that depends on it) currently, I want to confirm which is the case from Mobility Data's side long-term:
Is (1) or (2) the case from Mobility Data's side?
If I could vote - I'd voice my support for (1) but I'd like to find out either way which is the case.
Is the long-term roadmap wrt. mobility-database-catalogs & mobility-feed-api documented somewhere?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: