Have you seen VS 2015 Roslyn tooltips?

[dsaf]

It seems to be quite close to ET (R# 8.2.3) and while lacking important features has some interesting ones:

1. on constants they are also showing the constant's value;
2. they are omitting the full namespace on members;
3. extension methods are shown as "(extension)" not "(method)".
4. displaying info about operators (they are more like methods than keywords afterall);
5. "optional.Value.HasValue" is displayed as "double?.HasValue" not like "System.Nullable.HasValue" - is this C#6 specific?

In my opinion all of the above would be a great addition to ET.

[MrJul]

1. ReSharper does too. ET does not: it should definitely be changed.
2. Not sure about this by default, could be an option IMO. Same thing with containing classes for nested classes, modifiers or constant values.
3. Easy and helpful change, will do.
4. Already done as a side effect of Are some standard primitive types still using the default tooltip? #17.
5. It's not C# 6 specific, VS2013 already displays Nullable<T>.Value as T?.Value. I find it weird as a member path, but that's completely subjective. ET mimics ReSharper here and doesn't use type keywords to refer to a member's type. Another option?

[dsaf]

2. option is good;
3. I don't know now :). In C#6 and its null propagation I might get slightly confused whether I am looking at a null-safe code handling a POCO that happens to have a Value property or an actual Nullable:

public class FormulaEntry
{
   public double? Value { get; set; }
}
...
public void SafelyPrint(FormulaEntry entry)
{
   Console.WriteLine(entry?.Value.Value);
}

PS: Actually it's not that bad - option would be good I guess...

[MrJul]

1. and 3) fixed on f1aa2fe

[MrJul]

1, 3, 4 are fixed.
2 is #51
5 is #52