You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Right now, only a=1 will work because that indicates a normal cycle. However, circulant graphs with a>1 will cause the cycle to behave differently. This issue may only be needed if I'm having issues generating graphs, but it still isn't a bad idea to consider in case any issues arise in the future
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'm wondering if there is some sort of relationship I can exploit between the cycle and the value of a I can exploit similar to how I did to make check the cycles for a=1. This will need more investigation
This is defiantly and issue that needs to be looked at more. As I mentioned earlier, there may be some relationships I can exploit from the current get cycles method, but it needs to be worked on a bit more and actually coded in. I'll leave that for the future though
Right now, only a=1 will work because that indicates a normal cycle. However, circulant graphs with a>1 will cause the cycle to behave differently. This issue may only be needed if I'm having issues generating graphs, but it still isn't a bad idea to consider in case any issues arise in the future
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: