You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Personally, while technically correct, I find the concept that a 3-D image could be XYC or XYT or XYZ a bit too technical for this purpose. And if we wanted to speak this language and I think then there should be also 4-D and 5-D images and all the possible permutations that could mean.
What about keeping them as separate concepts:
Spatial dimensions: 2-D or 3-D
Time dimension: time
Channel dimension: channel
So the current Display of 3D images (channels) would become Display of 2D multi-channel images.
And for Display of 3D images (time, volume) I would probably make this separate Topics:
Display of 3-D images:
Ortho-slicing
Volume rendering
3-D animation (rotation, zoom)
Display of time-lapse images:
Videos
2-D time-lapse animation
3-D time-lapse animation
I know though that this is a huge debate and, e.g., the napari folks prefer to just want to speak about N-D arrays without attaching any semantics to the axes. So I am hot sure how to deal with this in this curriculum.
I think currently most image viewer and analysis software do make a clear distinction between X,Y,Z,T,C and thus I would lean towards also making this distinction.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently it looks like this:
And there also is this:
Personally, while technically correct, I find the concept that a 3-D image could be XYC or XYT or XYZ a bit too technical for this purpose. And if we wanted to speak this language and I think then there should be also 4-D and 5-D images and all the possible permutations that could mean.
What about keeping them as separate concepts:
So the current
Display of 3D images (channels)
would becomeDisplay of 2D multi-channel images
.And for
Display of 3D images (time, volume)
I would probably make this separate Topics:Display of 3-D images
:Display of time-lapse images
:I know though that this is a huge debate and, e.g., the napari folks prefer to just want to speak about N-D arrays without attaching any semantics to the axes. So I am hot sure how to deal with this in this curriculum.
I think currently most image viewer and analysis software do make a clear distinction between X,Y,Z,T,C and thus I would lean towards also making this distinction.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: