New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

import MOP directly into RXNO #17

Closed

StroemPhi opened this issue Nov 23, 2021 · 1 comment

Member

StroemPhi commented Nov 23, 2021

At the moment MOP is not directly imported into RXNO but only classes of it are imported.
This can lead to inconsitencies, e.g:

cycloaddition is for example subsumed under cyclisation in RXNO but not so in MOP.
there is a conflict between the classes polymerisation (MOP:0000629) & polymerisation reaction (RXNO:0000246) (or their respective subclasses), since both classes express the same chemical reaction type/mechanism but are subsumed under different parent classes ('molecular process' resp. 'carbon-carbon coupling reaction)

In order to maintain MOP and RXNO better, I therefore propose to import MOP directly into RXNO and resolve any conflicting issues.

Member Author

StroemPhi commented Nov 24, 2021 •

edited

Loading

moved to upstream repo: rsc-ontologies#27

StroemPhi closed this as completed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment