You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In my FATES-Hydro simulations over the Amazon Basin, I get unrealistic values of stem conductivity fraction when using the van Genuchten hydraulic transfer function for plants (i.e. fates_hydro_htftype_node = 2 for all organs) with the default value of fates_hydro_vg_alpha_node = 0.0005 MPa^-1. This is shown in the center plot below. The left figure shows the distribution of stem conductivity fraction with fates_hydro_htftype_node = 1 (i.e. TFS hydraulic transfer function, the default), and the right figure shows the distribution with fates_hydro_htftype_node = 2 and fates_hydro_htftype_node values several orders of magnitude larger than the default (specifically, 0.11855 MPa^-1 for the early successional tropical tree PFT and 0.088026 MPa^-1 for the late successional). These values are from Ding et al. (2023) for conifer forests in California, so may not be appropriate for tropical trees, but the default vg_alpha value is perhaps not appropriate either.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In my FATES-Hydro simulations over the Amazon Basin, I get unrealistic values of stem conductivity fraction when using the van Genuchten hydraulic transfer function for plants (i.e.
fates_hydro_htftype_node
= 2 for all organs) with the default value offates_hydro_vg_alpha_node
= 0.0005 MPa^-1. This is shown in the center plot below. The left figure shows the distribution of stem conductivity fraction withfates_hydro_htftype_node
= 1 (i.e. TFS hydraulic transfer function, the default), and the right figure shows the distribution withfates_hydro_htftype_node
= 2 andfates_hydro_htftype_node
values several orders of magnitude larger than the default (specifically, 0.11855 MPa^-1 for the early successional tropical tree PFT and 0.088026 MPa^-1 for the late successional). These values are from Ding et al. (2023) for conifer forests in California, so may not be appropriate for tropical trees, but the default vg_alpha value is perhaps not appropriate either.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: