Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create the absolute theory #103

Closed
scarlehoff opened this issue Jun 23, 2023 · 5 comments
Closed

Create the absolute theory #103

scarlehoff opened this issue Jun 23, 2023 · 5 comments

Comments

@scarlehoff
Copy link
Member

Rather than s trimming as proposed in #61 (or together with a trimming of unnecessary information). Let's define here in pineko the absolute theory. As discussed during this Wednesday code meeting, there is nothing in n3fit/vp that uses the theory card that is not used also by pineko (PTO being the only thing that is actually used but as mentioned, the order needs to be known by pineko to create the fktables/eko).

Once we have an absolute theory we just swap the one in the nnpdf repository for whatever we decide here.

@alecandido
Copy link
Member

alecandido commented Jun 23, 2023

This is not incompatible with #61, since the goal of #61 is actually to split the different theories out of the absolute theory (it was simply assuming that the current NNPDF theory format is already the absolute one)

flowchart LR
    abs(Absolute theory)
    eko(EKO theory)
    pf(pinefarm theory)
    abs --> eko
    abs --> pf
Loading

However, since the theory is mostly Evolution + DIS, the main goals are:

  1. complete porting the EKO theories Next runcards update eko#248
  2. move yadism theories to an analogue format of EKO (finding out which arguments we actually need)
  3. check if we want to add other parameters to the pinefarm theory, to serve Vrap, Madgraph, and Matrix @cschwan

@felixhekhorn
Copy link
Contributor

3. check if we want to add other parameters to the pinefarm theory, to serve Vrap, Madgraph, and Matrix @cschwan

see NNPDF/pinefarm#1

@felixhekhorn
Copy link
Contributor

This is also a further step in coupling pineko and pinefarm tighter together (as Numerical FONLL is doing cc @RoyStegeman ).
This decision is reasonable, but we should be aware of it.

@alecandido
Copy link
Member

This is also a further step in coupling pineko and pinefarm tighter together

Well, it's not really together, since the connection is asymmetric: as usual, it's Pineko that has to know things, while Pinefarm is only driven by, and will keep ignoring what's in the rest of the world.

@scarlehoff
Copy link
Member Author

This is now happening in NNPDF/nnpdf#2028 so I'll close it from here

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants