-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Aircraft UFO evaluation #92
Comments
The issue with reassigning the value of
The diag-file produces a bias-corrected |
I was able to get UFO aircraft
There are two steps in the YAML here, one to assign a new variable It is also worth recognizing that this is a shortcut that will have to eventually be replaced with YAML filters that can properly assign the "adjust" error values without relying on GSI data.
An additional error inflation filter,
A 100% acceptance between UFO and GSI is reached. |
I believe that a change needs to be made to When attempting to define aircraft Here I am plotting the final errors using the GSI "adjust" errors as a starting point on the x-axis and the final errors using the conventional error inflation on the "initial" (table) errors on the y-axis, broken out by aircraft I included some write statements in I noticed in the GSI/qcmod.f90
If I apply the same logic to
The resulting comparison between the final errors using GSI "adjust" errors as a crutch versus computing them from scratch looks much better: It's possible that this is not an issue specific to aircraft observations, since the |
Further testing of This might be a round-about way of addressing outstanding issues between GSI and UFO conventional ob error inflation, but there appears to be a dial here in how |
This issue is splitting from #60 so the sonde and aircraft validation does not get confused.
The starting point for this is the GMAO YAML, but there are many issues with these it appears.
The test YAMLs used here are in this branch.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: