You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When shifting a moving nest, many surface parameters require that downscaling from coarse resolution be aware of land/sea masks. Many land variables have -9999 or other physically invalid flag values for ocean points; these should not be interpolated onto high resolution land points.
Solution
Testing of the upcoming NOAH MP LSM moving nest code revealed some bugs in the initial implementation. While we are not ready to commit the NOAH MP moving nest code yet due to unresolved issues with upstream DA, the land mask code changes should provide an incremental increase in stability for the moving nest code with all physics options.
Alternatives
N/A
Testing:
Have you tested the code changes? On what platforms?
Have you run regression test in ufs-weather-model or ufs-s2s-model with code changes?
Will the baseline results change?
If yes, please give brief explanation of your code updates on the regression test.
Dependent PRs:
Should stand alone.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Description
When shifting a moving nest, many surface parameters require that downscaling from coarse resolution be aware of land/sea masks. Many land variables have -9999 or other physically invalid flag values for ocean points; these should not be interpolated onto high resolution land points.
Solution
Testing of the upcoming NOAH MP LSM moving nest code revealed some bugs in the initial implementation. While we are not ready to commit the NOAH MP moving nest code yet due to unresolved issues with upstream DA, the land mask code changes should provide an incremental increase in stability for the moving nest code with all physics options.
Alternatives
N/A
Testing:
Dependent PRs:
Should stand alone.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: