Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update gsi_enkf and gsi_utils hashes #2825

Closed
RussTreadon-NOAA opened this issue Aug 13, 2024 · 10 comments
Closed

Update gsi_enkf and gsi_utils hashes #2825

RussTreadon-NOAA opened this issue Aug 13, 2024 · 10 comments
Labels
feature New feature or request

Comments

@RussTreadon-NOAA
Copy link
Contributor

What new functionality do you need?

GSI and GSI_utils develop have been updated with changes required by GFS v17. These changes need to be pulled into g-w.

What are the requirements for the new functionality?

Update gsi_enkf.fd and gsi_utils.fd hashes in g-w sorc/

Acceptance Criteria

sorc/gsi_enkf.fd and sorc/gsi_utils.fd hashes are updated.

Suggest a solution (optional)

No response

@RussTreadon-NOAA RussTreadon-NOAA added feature New feature or request triage Issues that are triage labels Aug 13, 2024
@RussTreadon-NOAA
Copy link
Contributor Author

@CatherineThomas-NOAA , @CoryMartin-NOAA , @emilyhcliu : The develop branches of GSI and GSI-utils contain recent commits which we want to exercise in GFS v17. Three questions

  1. Are there any other GFS v17 changes we want in GSI or GSI-utils? For example, I think we should get Xin's bug fix in GSI issue #778 into GSI develop. Any other changes to either repo?
  2. Are any GFS v17 updates to GSI-Monitor?
  3. To whom can we assign this g-w issue?

@CoryMartin-NOAA
Copy link
Contributor

I plan to update GSI-utils for aerosol analysis capabilities

@DavidHuber-NOAA
Copy link
Contributor

I also have a gsi-utils PR (49) open that will allow C768 to run on Hera.

@CatherineThomas-NOAA
Copy link
Contributor

  1. I agree that Xin's fix should also get in. I believe the changes for turning on the ensemble spread tapering would only be on the workflow side, but I'm not sure if CRTMv3 would require any changes?
  2. @EdwardSafford-NOAA was planning on looking at whether the monitors needed any changes. @EdwardSafford-NOAA Any update on this?
  3. Since the main changes are Thompson related, maybe someone from the all-sky side to make sure all the new defaults are set properly? @emilyhcliu @azadeh-gh @ADCollard @xincjin-NOAA? I can do it if need be.

@EdwardSafford-NOAA
Copy link
Contributor

@CatherineThomas-NOAA I've tested monitor plotting on hera and that works using my test data. However the workflow monitor data output location has changed and I'll need to update the monitors to account for that. Do you have an experiment running (or recently run) on hera that I could use for monitor test data?

@CatherineThomas-NOAA
Copy link
Contributor

@EdwardSafford-NOAA
I ran an experiment recently that has a couple cycles on disk:
/scratch1/NCEPDEV/stmp2/Catherine.Thomas/ROTDIRS/physics_taper

For example, see:
/scratch1/NCEPDEV/stmp2/Catherine.Thomas/ROTDIRS/physics_taper/gdas.20230429/18/products/atmos/radmon

All the monitor data is also saved on HPSS:
/NCEPDEV/emc-da/1year/Catherine.Thomas/HERA/scratch/physics_taper
under gdas.tar.

@EdwardSafford-NOAA
Copy link
Contributor

@CatherineThomas-NOAA Thanks. I have a PR set now to update the monitor utility scripts: GSI-Monitor 142.

@RussTreadon-NOAA
Copy link
Contributor Author

@CatherineThomas-NOAA , @EdwardSafford-NOAA 's GSI-Monitor PR #142 has been merged into GSI-Monitor develop. Done at 4e5feb7

@WalterKolczynski-NOAA WalterKolczynski-NOAA removed the triage Issues that are triage label Aug 26, 2024
@RussTreadon-NOAA
Copy link
Contributor Author

We now have g-w issue #3027 to update the GSI hash. Can this issue be closed?

@DavidHuber-NOAA
Copy link
Contributor

Yes, I think so.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants