You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
More details:
When I do split by percent, I expect the %val + %trn to match the total of the patch. Instead, I have fewer tails than I expected in the validation set, or training set, or both. It seems that the split is made from the total of patches, and then each split is filtered to the %of_annotation. This logic leads to the deletion of some tiles and the mismatch of expected number of tiles per split.
I notice percent in the split dataset do not match the expected proportions. It seems split is made before filtering patches by min_annot_perc.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: