Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Large pose error between isaac_ros_foundationpose and NV foundationpose #274

Open
wengdunfang opened this issue Dec 12, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@wengdunfang
Copy link

wengdunfang commented Dec 12, 2024

Hi , I used the demo_data of NV foundationpose to test the effect of isaac_ros_foundationpose, but the result was very poor.

Hardware: Orin AGX 64G
Soft: Ubuntu2204 Jetpack6.0
I operate in full accordance with the official isaac_ros_foundaitonpose.
The PY file I generated for ros2 topic is:
inputAll_rosDepthMaskRgbDemo.zip (1.5 KB)
My launch file is:
isaac_ros_foundationpose.launch.py.zip (1.8 KB)

NV foundationpose: pose
0.60706 -0.25581 0.752346 -0.4481580
-0.7754 -0.39773 0.490446 0.1188301
0.17376 -0.88111 -0.439814 0.801678
0 0 0 1
isaac_ros_foundationpose: pose
0.63274191 0.41554977 0.65341875 -0.43281102
-0.73410747 0.59042317 0.33539037 0.13828093
-0.24642217 -0.69189513 0.67864368 0.78675467
0 0 0 1

https://forums.developer.nvidia.com/t/isaac-ros-foundationpose-and-nv-foundaitonpose/316592

@jwd-sbb
Copy link

jwd-sbb commented Dec 19, 2024

Using model-based approach.
Achieving improved pose from FP and a manageable angular error is anticipated, but there remains a significant centroid error.

Please validate yours as well.

#279

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants