The quality of generated character images seems not to be very good？

[wudidiandian]

I tried it on the demo. I used simple and detailed prompt words to generate a female character. I tried adjusting the Sampling steps and Negative prompt, but the quality of the character picture I got was a bit poor, mainly on the face. and hand, but the speed of drawing is really fast. I don’t know if it’s my usage method that’s wrong or a problem with this demo. I hope the author can explain how to set the parameters to generate high-quality pictures when publishing the source code.

[ashrafbay]

I tried it on the demo. I used simple and detailed prompt words to generate a female character. I tried adjusting the Sampling steps and Negative prompt, but the quality of the character picture I got was a bit poor, mainly on the face. and hand, but the speed of drawing is really fast. I don’t know if it’s my usage method that’s wrong or a problem with this demo. I hope the author can explain how to set the parameters to generate high-quality pictures when publishing the source code.

I strongly disagree with you that it is at least twice better than sdxl and follows the script very well. I think it is a mistake on your part. Note that I am just a user and not part of the development team

[lawrence-cj]

The released version will be further trained. This is a prototype demo for experience.

[Bocchi-Chan2023]

The released version will be further trained. This is a prototype demo for experience.

The compression ratio of webp in demo is too high.

By the way, is it only for this demo that only hearts are generated when inappropriate words are entered?

[lawrence-cj]

The compression ratio of webp in demo is too high.

This is a good point. I think I will change it to png next time.

By the way, is it only for this demo that only hearts are generated when inappropriate words are entered?

There is a safety word checking function in this online demo.