Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Sharing iP code quality feedback [for @NereusWB922] - Round 2 #12

Open
nus-se-script opened this issue Oct 16, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Comments

@nus-se-script
Copy link

@NereusWB922 We did an automated analysis of your code to detect potential areas to improve the code quality. We are sharing the results below, so that you can avoid similar problems in your tP code (which will be graded more strictly for code quality).

IMPORTANT: Note that the script looked for just a few easy-to-detect problems only, and at-most three example are given i.e., there can be other areas/places to improve.

Aspect: Tab Usage

No easy-to-detect issues 👍

Aspect: Naming boolean variables/methods

No easy-to-detect issues 👍

Aspect: Brace Style

No easy-to-detect issues 👍

Aspect: Package Name Style

No easy-to-detect issues 👍

Aspect: Class Name Style

No easy-to-detect issues 👍

Aspect: Dead Code

No easy-to-detect issues 👍

Aspect: Method Length

No easy-to-detect issues 👍

Aspect: Class size

No easy-to-detect issues 👍

Aspect: Header Comments

Example from src/main/java/corgi/State.java lines 59-64:

    /**
     * Add target task to the task list.
     *
     * @param task The target task.
     * @return New state with the updated task list.
     */

Example from src/main/java/corgi/State.java lines 73-79:

    /**
     * Remove task at the target index in the task list.
     *
     * @param index The target index.
     * @return New state with the updated task list.
     * @throws TaskListIndexOutOfBoundsException
     */

Example from src/main/java/corgi/State.java lines 106-108:

    /**
     * Store the current task list to local.
     */

Suggestion: Ensure method/class header comments follow the format specified in the coding standard, in particular, the phrasing of the overview statement.

Aspect: Recent Git Commit Message

possible problems in commit 5ccfcff:


Merge pull request #11 from NereusWB922/5-sharing-ip-code-quality-feedback-for-nereuswb922

Solve issue #5

  • Longer than 72 characters

Suggestion: Follow the given conventions for Git commit messages for future commits (do not modify past commit messages as doing so will change the commit timestamp that we used to detect your commit timings).

Aspect: Binary files in repo

No easy-to-detect issues 👍


❗ You are not required to (but you are welcome to) fix the above problems in your iP, unless you have been separately asked to resubmit the iP due to code quality issues.

ℹ️ The bot account used to post this issue is un-manned. Do not reply to this post (as those replies will not be read). Instead, contact [email protected] if you want to follow up on this post.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant