You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, for a multi-step horizon, MLForecast allows the recursive and the direct strategy. As the models for the direct strategy are independent of each other, training a model for every step up to max_horizon can create a lot of overhead when only some of those models are actually required. Say I want to predict 7 and 14 days in advance - the direct strategy would train 14 models, but I would only be needing two of those.
I propose a horizons parameter to be added to MLForecast and LightGBMCV that allows specifying directly which steps to train on, like so:
Description
Currently, for a multi-step horizon, MLForecast allows the recursive and the direct strategy. As the models for the direct strategy are independent of each other, training a model for every step up to max_horizon can create a lot of overhead when only some of those models are actually required. Say I want to predict 7 and 14 days in advance - the direct strategy would train 14 models, but I would only be needing two of those.
I propose a horizons parameter to be added to MLForecast and LightGBMCV that allows specifying directly which steps to train on, like so:
Use case
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: