You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Users can both type a value to filter for themselves, or they can click on a property somewhere in the UI. In the latter case, I'd like to treat the search as an exact match. Eg in the following example the filter group:"Group 1" is treated as a wildcard search. But i'd like it to match only users in Group 1:
Right now, I don't think it's possible.
Quotes are more like "match every word inside" rather than "exactly this".
For something like that it would need a new operator, probably just for tag like the range ones, maybe tag:exactly(value), to be checked if its exactly the value or not and I can see it as a useful use case.
On Sat, Apr 29, 2023, 20:57 Bruno Noriller ***@***.***> wrote:
Right now, I don't think it's possible.
Quotes are more like "match every word inside" rather than "exactly this".
For something like that it would need a new operator, probably just for
tag like the range ones, maybe tag:exactly(value), to be checked if its
exactly the value or not and I can see it as a useful use case.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#17 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAD2UVV3GHDJ4GYYAD26RYTXDVQABANCNFSM6AAAAAAXPBXI7U>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
Users can both type a value to filter for themselves, or they can click on a property somewhere in the UI. In the latter case, I'd like to treat the search as an exact match. Eg in the following example the filter
group:"Group 1"
is treated as a wildcard search. But i'd like it to match only users inGroup 1
:The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: