You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The recovery violation can be fixed by correcting false_path objects in bladerf.sdc (see bladerf.zip attachment), but the setup violation of ~2ns for the slow corner means reducing rx_clock to 46.8M samples/sec.
Quartus version 17.1
Versions of ALTLVDS_RX and ALTLVDS_TX : v17.1.0 Build 590 SJ Lite Edition.
Could you please clarify if this is expected behavior. We have some improvements to setup timing (-1ns) (by modifying Quartus optimization settings) and can raise a pull request if desired.
@ssa-tii we're looking at potentially updating the SDC. Curious if you had a pull request for the false_path and rx_clock you mentioned? Also, the timing closure values may differ a bit with a newer version of Quartus, I'd suggest using at least version 20.
Hello,
I built latest commit [9fc57e6] for
hosted
revision and found timing violations:See resulting static timing analysis report (hosted.sta.zip)
The recovery violation can be fixed by correcting
false_path
objects in bladerf.sdc (see bladerf.zip attachment), but the setup violation of ~2ns for the slow corner means reducingrx_clock
to 46.8M samples/sec.Quartus version 17.1
Versions of ALTLVDS_RX and ALTLVDS_TX : v17.1.0 Build 590 SJ Lite Edition.
Could you please clarify if this is expected behavior. We have some improvements to setup timing (-1ns) (by modifying Quartus optimization settings) and can raise a pull request if desired.
Static timing analysis report (hosted.sta.zip)
bladerf.sdc (bladerf.zip)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: