Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clarify formatting requirement for BOSC abstracts #30

Open
nlharris opened this issue Apr 29, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Clarify formatting requirement for BOSC abstracts #30

nlharris opened this issue Apr 29, 2023 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@nlharris
Copy link
Member

In https://github.com/OBF/bosc_materials/blob/master/BOSC_review_process.md, the "Acceptance criteria" include

Correctly formatted: Abstracts must be in PDF format, are limited to two 8.5x11” or A4 pages (for BOSC 2021) and should include the title, author name(s), open source license, and code or project URL. Accepted abstracts are published on the BOSC website as-is.

In fact, although we can (and have) summarily reject abstracts that blatantly violate the format requirements (e.g. a 7-page paper), we don't reject abstracts that lack metadata such as author names, URL, etc.; we just request that they add that info. This criterion should probably be moved from "Acceptance criteria" to "Additional criteria" next year.

@nlharris nlharris self-assigned this Apr 29, 2023
@nlharris
Copy link
Member Author

#31 fixes this in the review process md

Also need to remember to change in the review form in EasyChair next year.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant