We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I would like to work with the EDI but without implementing an standardized exchange (and technically, without using component).
component
What I need is more basics concepts: backend and exchange records.
So concretly, what do you think about moving some models from edi_oca to base_edi?
edi_oca
base_edi
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@simahawk @jbaudoux
Sorry, something went wrong.
I think this is a good move.
@simahawk Can I start a PR about this?
simahawk
No branches or pull requests
I would like to work with the EDI but without implementing an standardized exchange (and technically, without using
component
).What I need is more basics concepts: backend and exchange records.
So concretly, what do you think about moving some models from
edi_oca
tobase_edi
?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: