-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add MNE as option for source recon #200
Comments
A secondary benefit of having this option is we can test osl-dynamics on MNE-style source reconstructed data. I've been getting requests from people that want to apply osl-dynamics to data they've source reconstructed with MNE. I think what we would add to OSL is basically a wrapper for MNE? With batch processing? Otherwise, surely example scripts/tutorials for source reconstruction are already available in the MNE docs? |
Agreed. This should be relatively straightforward if we write a wrapper for MNE-Python. |
I think something like this would work @cgohil8:
Note that you could equivalently apply this directly to MNE Evoked data, but you would have to use Also note that there are some options for applying the inverse, including The code above returns an MNE VolSourceEstimate, which might be a bit annoying to work with. We can always put the data in a raw array like below
|
It would be good if we could use minimum norm estimate (MNE) as an alternative to beamforming. This will especially be useful when we expect highly correlated sources (e.g., in an auditory experiment).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: