Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GSOC 2025 project Real time collaboration rooms #3263

Open
DonnieBLT opened this issue Jan 24, 2025 · 16 comments · May be fixed by #3272
Open

GSOC 2025 project Real time collaboration rooms #3263

DonnieBLT opened this issue Jan 24, 2025 · 16 comments · May be fixed by #3272

Comments

@DonnieBLT
Copy link
Collaborator

image

@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to Backlog in 📌 All Jan 24, 2025
@DonnieBLT DonnieBLT changed the title GSOC 2025 project Real time collaborative rooms GSOC 2025 project Real time collaboration rooms Jan 24, 2025
@krrish-sehgal
Copy link
Contributor

/assign

Copy link
Contributor

Hello @krrish-sehgal! You've been assigned to OWASP-BLT/BLT issue #3263. You have 24 hours to complete a pull request.

@krrish-sehgal
Copy link
Contributor

krrish-sehgal commented Jan 24, 2025

@DonnieBLT sir ,I am planning to create an option such as : Under Contribute section > Discussion > Create a discussion room ( New model for the room, might be useful to store socket id , if a live video conf is going on) > options to text in group(won't be through sockets) > options to start video conf(can be achieved using sockets and web rtc).

Let me know if this aligns from what you have in mind.
Thank You.

@DonnieBLT
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Sounds good! I was thinking groups can be connected to organizations and / or projects and more

@krrish-sehgal
Copy link
Contributor

Sure so > under the organsation and projects and where ever we want the discussion room , we can have a start discussion button > where user can fill up the room details (again stored in the room model).

@DonnieBLT
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Sounds good!

Copy link
Contributor

⏰ This issue has been automatically unassigned due to 24 hours of inactivity.
The issue is now available for anyone to work on again.

@krrish-sehgal
Copy link
Contributor

/assign

Copy link
Contributor

Hello @krrish-sehgal! You've been assigned to OWASP-BLT/BLT issue #3263. You have 24 hours to complete a pull request.

Copy link
Contributor

⏰ This issue has been automatically unassigned due to 24 hours of inactivity.
The issue is now available for anyone to work on again.

1 similar comment
Copy link
Contributor

⏰ This issue has been automatically unassigned due to 24 hours of inactivity.
The issue is now available for anyone to work on again.

@krrish-sehgal
Copy link
Contributor

/assign

Copy link
Contributor

Hello @krrish-sehgal! You've been assigned to OWASP-BLT/BLT issue #3263. You have 24 hours to complete a pull request.

Copy link
Contributor

⏰ This issue has been automatically unassigned due to 24 hours of inactivity.
The issue is now available for anyone to work on again.

2 similar comments
Copy link
Contributor

⏰ This issue has been automatically unassigned due to 24 hours of inactivity.
The issue is now available for anyone to work on again.

Copy link
Contributor

⏰ This issue has been automatically unassigned due to 24 hours of inactivity.
The issue is now available for anyone to work on again.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Backlog
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants