You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
With the realization that the top 10 focuses on the risks that vulnerabilities, I recommend changing our template and the content of the Top 10 to match.
The TL;DR
Fo to the OWASP Top 10 page and the first 2 sentences read:
The OWASP Top 10 is a standard awareness document for developers and web application security. It represents a broad consensus about the most critical security risks to web applications.
I agree that this makes sense, but think we need to reach consensus. In the meantime though, I've updated the style guide and the template for entries to swap out this wording in favor of risk, so folks can see what that looks like. (I did NOT update the entries for 1.1 to match, but feel we probably can do that for the next sprint if folks agree to this change).
With the realization that the top 10 focuses on the risks that vulnerabilities, I recommend changing our template and the content of the Top 10 to match.
The TL;DR
Fo to the OWASP Top 10 page and the first 2 sentences read:
My detailed reasoning is in this document: risks-vs-vulnerabilities.md
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: