Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[LFG] Suggestion: Allow LFG without voice channel #52

Closed
EternalllZM opened this issue Jul 6, 2022 · 0 comments
Closed

[LFG] Suggestion: Allow LFG without voice channel #52

EternalllZM opened this issue Jul 6, 2022 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@EternalllZM
Copy link

Feature Description
Either:

A. Add a way to disable the voice channel requirement, bypassing the value for the voice channel and/or separate template for non-voice requests similar to the lfg without any further fields.

B. Allow toggling the "You are not in a voice channel" error, if the above cannot be done. (see below)

Alternatives Considered
I have considered using the Defender cog warden module for this but I really do not want to due to amount of time required + the current LFG command invoked without voice would result in "You are not in a voice channel" regardless. I do not want split systems handling a single task.

Additional Context
Our current LFG system works well and has for a long time. However, as it grows past more and more tens of thousands of members, we would like to enforce using the LFG system and not requiring a voice channel entry would work well as an enforced post template requiring certain values.

@EternalllZM EternalllZM added the enhancement New feature or request label Jul 6, 2022
@EternalllZM EternalllZM closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Jul 28, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants