You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
A. Add a way to disable the voice channel requirement, bypassing the value for the voice channel and/or separate template for non-voice requests similar to the lfg without any further fields.
B. Allow toggling the "You are not in a voice channel" error, if the above cannot be done. (see below)
Alternatives Considered
I have considered using the Defender cog warden module for this but I really do not want to due to amount of time required + the current LFG command invoked without voice would result in "You are not in a voice channel" regardless. I do not want split systems handling a single task.
Additional Context
Our current LFG system works well and has for a long time. However, as it grows past more and more tens of thousands of members, we would like to enforce using the LFG system and not requiring a voice channel entry would work well as an enforced post template requiring certain values.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Feature Description
Either:
A. Add a way to disable the voice channel requirement, bypassing the value for the voice channel and/or separate template for non-voice requests similar to the lfg without any further fields.
B. Allow toggling the "You are not in a voice channel" error, if the above cannot be done. (see below)
Alternatives Considered
I have considered using the Defender cog warden module for this but I really do not want to due to amount of time required + the current LFG command invoked without voice would result in "You are not in a voice channel" regardless. I do not want split systems handling a single task.
Additional Context
Our current LFG system works well and has for a long time. However, as it grows past more and more tens of thousands of members, we would like to enforce using the LFG system and not requiring a voice channel entry would work well as an enforced post template requiring certain values.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: