Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[REQUEST] Allow Downloader to grab tags from a list #48

Open
KayJay95 opened this issue Oct 16, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

[REQUEST] Allow Downloader to grab tags from a list #48

KayJay95 opened this issue Oct 16, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@KayJay95
Copy link

Describe the solution you'd like

What I'd imagine is the user being able to load a .txt into the Downloader which runs through the tags on said .txt file

Example:
Say I want to download once with these tags [-sound male] and once with these tags [-sound female] etc.
If I run them manually it can take quite a while and if you were able to run a list it'd streamline the downloading process.
In addition to that you could (once the feature is implemented at all 😉) give each tag row a different downloading destination.

Something like this:
-sound male -o F:/test/s
-sound female -o F:/test/q

  • Here, it would firstly download all images corresponding to these tags (-sound male) and save them here: F:/test/s
  • When that is done it would go into the second row and download all images with these tags (-sound female) and save them here: F:/test/q

Describe alternatives you've considered

What could also work is being able to pre-input the tags, though I'd imagine that'd be harder then the main idea

Additional context

I download a lot of pools and inputting them manually is quite annoying, hence the idea 🙃

(I hope it's clear what I mean, but I'm open for more questions 😄 love the downloader btw ❤️)

@KayJay95 KayJay95 added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 16, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants