You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the current version of the Projection STAC extension, it should indeed be "properties"/"proj:epsg"
Re: older standards: my first impression is that epsg at the top level was never really part of the STAC spec or the Projection extension.
I had a look at the STAC spec v0.0.9, v0.0.8 and the previous version of the Projection extension (v1.0.0) but as far as I can tell they also expect "properties"/"proj:epsg" (going by the examples they provide).
To fully confirm it I would have to dig deeper. But another indication is that a few bits of the stacspec changelog indicate that in older versions they were using eo:epsg rather than epsg at the top level. Some changelog messages say they moved from using eo:epsg in an older standard, to proj:epsg.
A batch job results item has a top-level
"epsg"
property:I would expect
"properties"/"proj:epsg"
instead but I'm not sure if this is maybe according to an older version of STAC.@JohanKJSchreurs?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: