You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
That paper essentially describes an early energy systems ontology. And I do suggest a quick skim for an historical perspective.
Energy services are defined thus in the introduction: "energy services are the ends for which the energy system provides the means".
So that is quite general. I will add that specific energy services are usually specified using intensive variables: air temperature, speed over land, illumination level (technically luminance), and so on. So I think that aspect is quite important. More on Wikipedia:
I am not sure what the equivalent metric for a hair cut would be: relative removed mass of hair?
As first approximation, I would argue that the energy service is independent from the length of the removed hair. However the hair cut involves a lot of other subprocesses that has each it own energy service (e.g. the hair salon needs illumination, the hair drier increases temperature...).
That paper essentially describes an early energy systems ontology. And I do suggest a quick skim for an historical perspective.
Energy services are defined thus in the introduction: "
energy services
are the ends for which the energy system provides the means".So that is quite general. I will add that specific energy services are usually specified using intensive variables: air temperature, speed over land, illumination level (technically luminance), and so on. So I think that aspect is quite important. More on Wikipedia:
I am not sure what the equivalent metric for a
hair cut
would be: relative removed mass of hair?Incidentally, that cited paper underpinned the deeco framework, now archived here on GitHub:
Originally posted by @robbiemorrison in #1514 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: