Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Regarding the questions about fastfarm wake simulation #2592

Closed
shipors opened this issue Dec 25, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed

Regarding the questions about fastfarm wake simulation #2592

shipors opened this issue Dec 25, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@shipors
Copy link

shipors commented Dec 25, 2024

Merry Christmas!

Can I turn off the high-resolution VTK output and maintain only the low-resolution output when focusing on the wake impact relationships between turbines?

I've noticed that after setting up a simulation for a certain period, the wake visuals do not gradually extend to downstream turbines but instead remain at a certain position behind the upstream turbines. What should I do to address this issue?

Is there a way to determine which upstream turbines' wakes are affecting a particular turbine when simulating dozens of turbines simultaneously?

I have observed that downstream turbines only experience wake effects once the upstream turbines' wakes have propagated to their positions. Are there any methods to speed up this process?

Best wishes, god bless you

@jjonkman
Copy link
Collaborator

Dear @shipors,

Here are my responses:.

I'm not sure I understand your first question, but I would say that the VTK output should only be used when you want to visualize the wake behavior. If you are running many (hundreds to thousands) of simulations, generating VTK output will slow down FAST.Farm and require a lot of storage. I would suggest disabling VTK output if you are running many cases, and rerun the cases that you want to visualize with VTK output enabled.

Regarding wakes ending prematurely (without the wake deficit gradually decaying away), this implies that NumPlanes may need to be increased. It may be that you are not following the recommended FAST.Farm modeling guidance for other spatial-temporal descritization settings (https://openfast.readthedocs.io/en/main/source/user/fast.farm/ModelGuidance.html), which results in an incorrect setting for NumPlanes.

While FAST.Farm internally superimposes wakes from upwind turbines to impact the inflow of downwind turbines, there is currently no convenient way of writing which turbines impact others in an output file. But this should be reasonably clear through the farm-wide wake visualization output.

FAST.Farm does have a sizeable start-up transient as it takes time for the wakes to propagate after model initialization. There is not currently a way to speed up or eliminate this start-up transient. It is currently recommend to estimate what this start-up transient time is (see the modeling guidance) and ignore that time period when post-processing FAST.Farm outputs.

Best regards,

@shipors shipors closed this as completed Dec 27, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants