Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Extend Breguet range equation for electric aircraft #564

Open
jkirk5 opened this issue Oct 9, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Extend Breguet range equation for electric aircraft #564

jkirk5 opened this issue Oct 9, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@jkirk5
Copy link
Contributor

jkirk5 commented Oct 9, 2024

Desired capability or behavior.

The Breguet range cruise phase in 2DOF equations of motion currently fails if the aircraft does not change mass between timesteps (i.e. all-electric aircraft). This is because mass is the integrating variable and is expected to change between timesteps. The equations of motion need to be extended to support electrified aircraft.

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

No response

Associated Bug Report

No response

@jkirk5 jkirk5 added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 9, 2024
@jkirk5
Copy link
Contributor Author

jkirk5 commented Dec 26, 2024

A "universal" breguet range equation that can handle any aircraft may not be possible because it would need a generic propulsive efficiency which is difficult to get from some engine models, such as tabular data. We have access to total fuel consumption, change in battery state of charge (total electric power consumption), and thrust so something might be possible?

Creating a separate "all-electric" breguet range phase is simple and straightforward, and is a reasonable limitation. The user would need to choose if they want to use the fuel-based or electric-based breguet range phase . In this case, we eventually need to derive a non-breguet cruise phase for 2DOF so we can fly hybrid aircraft using it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant