Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Motion with amendments projection - enhancement #4159

Open
MSoeb opened this issue Sep 20, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Motion with amendments projection - enhancement #4159

MSoeb opened this issue Sep 20, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
enhancement General enhancement which is neither bug nor feature high Schrödinger projectname
Milestone

Comments

@MSoeb
Copy link

MSoeb commented Sep 20, 2024

Current behavior
The current state of the motion with amendments projection has improvement potential. If a motion has several amendments, with changed in different paragraphs, the projection will show at first the first amendment with all it's changes and than the second and so on. This leads to the strange situation, that the projection of the content start by line 1 till the end of the first amendment and start again by line 1 with the second amendment. Addtitionally the projection doesn't show the number of the amendment nor if amendments are in conflict. This needs to be improved, because in complexe amendment scenarios it is hard to distinguish in the projection which amendment is now shown and it's irritating to see the prjection start again with line 1.

Wanted behavior
The projection should follow the same layout logic like the motion detail view. There it is easy to spot amendment conflicts and information about the current shown number of the amendment.

@MSoeb MSoeb added enhancement General enhancement which is neither bug nor feature Schrödinger projectname labels Sep 20, 2024
@MSoeb MSoeb added this to the 4.2 milestone Sep 20, 2024
@MSoeb MSoeb added the high label Sep 23, 2024
@Elblinator
Copy link
Member

After talking about the concept:

  • General motion/amendments projection: the projection should be paragraph driven and not amendment driven, meaning that e.g. the first paragraph should be projected as motion/amendment 1/ amendment 2/ etc. and then the second, third ....
  • the same warn icon should be projected as it is in the motion-detail
  • The amendment nr should be projected in the same line as the icon (if there is no nr then only the icon is projected
  • The amendment status should not be projected
  • The icon and Nr should be indented in the same way as they are displayed in the motion-detail
  • If an amendment has no icon and no Nr then the word "Amendment" should be projected
  • If reasonably possible in this issue the submitter from the amendment should be behind the Nr

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement General enhancement which is neither bug nor feature high Schrödinger projectname
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants