Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Sequential navigation in complex objects #3086

Open
teamestreet opened this issue Apr 15, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Sequential navigation in complex objects #3086

teamestreet opened this issue Apr 15, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
Features Issues related to building and enhancing features Priority - Medium Issues that should be prioritized ahead of low but not immediately critical - bulk of work cycles Question

Comments

@teamestreet
Copy link
Collaborator

Descriptive summary

In complex objects the UV displays items one at a time, and users must click on item titles in the index tab to view children.

Expected behavior

Would like to use side arrows or top navigation similar to pdfs to navigate through children within complex objects.

Related work

Accessibility Concerns
@teamestreet teamestreet added Question Features Issues related to building and enhancing features Priority - Medium Issues that should be prioritized ahead of low but not immediately critical - bulk of work cycles labels Apr 15, 2024
@briesenberg07
Copy link

+1 for making navigation in complex objects easier!

Another possibility for expected behavior (?):
*Keep left-hand CONTENTS menu in the viewer on "Index" instead of reverting to "Thumbnails" each time a new item in the complex object is selected.

image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Features Issues related to building and enhancing features Priority - Medium Issues that should be prioritized ahead of low but not immediately critical - bulk of work cycles Question
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@briesenberg07 @teamestreet