Review and enhance type definitions for improved type safety

[Hemanthr1]

Issue Description

While our current type coverage is approximately 95%, we want to ensure that our type definitions are as robust and precise as possible. This issue aims to review existing type definitions, identify any areas for improvement, and enhance overall type safety in the project.

Environment

For Frontend Issues:

• Browser: All modern browsers

Steps to Reproduce

This is an enhancement issue for improving existing type definitions.

Expected Behavior

After reviewing and enhancing the type definitions:

• Improved type safety across the project
• More precise and descriptive type definitions
• Reduced potential for type-related bugs
• Better developer experience with enhanced autocomplete and type inference
• Possibly uncovering edge cases or potential issues through stricter typing

Actual Behavior

• Current type coverage is at 95%
• Some type definitions may be too broad or not as precise as they could be
• Potential for improvement in complex areas like state management or API responses
• Possible missing type definitions for edge cases or rarely used properties

Additional Context

• This task is about refining our existing type definitions rather than adding new ones from scratch
• Focus on areas where more precise types could prevent potential bugs or improve code clarity
• Consider reviewing third-party library types and ensuring our usage aligns with their latest definitions
• This task may uncover areas where our implementation could be improved to better match precise types

Remember, the goal is not just to achieve 100% type coverage, but to make our types as meaningful and precise as possible. This will lead to better code quality, fewer runtime errors, and an improved developer experience.