Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[NES] Please support iNES mapper 30 #80

Open
BenMcLean opened this issue Oct 26, 2018 · 2 comments
Open

[NES] Please support iNES mapper 30 #80

BenMcLean opened this issue Oct 26, 2018 · 2 comments

Comments

@BenMcLean
Copy link

BenMcLean commented Oct 26, 2018

NESMaker is a great new tool for creating NES games but most of the games produced (with a few exceptions) are going to be mapper 30, which means they'll crash on the current Go-Play. It would be wonderful for them to be playable on the ODROID GO but to do this, the emulator will need to add support for mapper 30.

I think this feature is worthwhile because we're likely to see many homebrew titles on this mapper over the next decade thanks to NESMaker and other efforts.

Maybe how RetroArch implemented this could be of help? :)

I'd also very much appreciate getting mapper 163 to work in order to play Final Fantasy VII (NES)

@BenMcLean
Copy link
Author

BenMcLean commented Oct 27, 2018

A good test for mapper 30 support might be the "Troll Burner" game on this page.

They provide an alternative mapper 2 version, but not all the features of NESMaker will allow conversion to mapper 2 for future titles. NESMaker games will be mapper 30 by default and emulators should support mapper 30 IMO.

@awakebyjava
Copy link

awakebyjava commented Dec 25, 2018

I'd like to see support for mapper 30 was well, as I just got the ODROID GO and have been working on my western NESmaker game for a while. Troll Burner (mapper 2) works fine on the Odroid. I know there is a way to add cores, but I don't have the time to dig into it right now. Would be nice to see it supported.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants