Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add a way to search stdout/stderr #4

Open
theres-waldo opened this issue Jul 10, 2019 · 5 comments
Open

Add a way to search stdout/stderr #4

theres-waldo opened this issue Jul 10, 2019 · 5 comments

Comments

@theres-waldo
Copy link

I often start a debugging session by finding a relevant / interesting line in the output. Having to press the "more" button in the stdout/stderr view a hundred times to see all the output inhibits this.

@khuey
Copy link
Member

khuey commented Jul 10, 2019

We've been contemplating adding a "find" feature. I presume that would get the job done?

@theres-waldo
Copy link
Author

theres-waldo commented Jul 10, 2019

What would it do if the result is in middle of the collapsed section -- expand it all? Or create two collapsed sections to either side of the result?

My personal preference would be to have a way to show all the output, which can then be searched using the browser's search. If the browser search is too slow, then the site could provide a faster search as a bonus.

@rocallahan
Copy link
Contributor

The problem is that "all the output" could be a really huge amount of output that, when added to the DOM, makes performance terrible.

@theres-waldo theres-waldo changed the title Add a way to show the entire stdout/stderr at once Add a way to search stdout/stderr Jul 10, 2019
@theres-waldo
Copy link
Author

This is true. Let me morph this into two issues, then: (1) searching stdout/stderr, and (2) downloading stdout/stderr for processing elsewhere.

@theres-waldo
Copy link
Author

Filed #5 for downloading.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants