Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Request for Xiaomi Vacuum B106 BK / Xiaomi Robot Vacum T12 #529

Open
3 of 7 tasks
AquaCobell opened this issue Apr 25, 2024 · 3 comments
Open
3 of 7 tasks

Request for Xiaomi Vacuum B106 BK / Xiaomi Robot Vacum T12 #529

AquaCobell opened this issue Apr 25, 2024 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request new platform

Comments

@AquaCobell
Copy link

Checklist

  • I have updated the integration to the latest version available
  • I have checked if the vacuum/platform is already requested
  • I have sent raw map file to piotr.machowski.dev [at] gmail.com (Retrieving map; please provide your GitHub username in the email)

What vacuum model do you want to be supported?

xiaomi.vacuum.b106bk

What is its name?

Xiaomi Robot Vacum T12

Available APIs

  • xiaomi
  • viomi
  • roidmi
  • dreame

Errors shown in the HA logs (if applicable)

Vacuum xiaomi.vacuum.b106bk is not supported.

Other info

No response

@NilusvanEdel
Copy link

I felt so free to send the missing raw map.

@NilusvanEdel
Copy link

This goes hand in hand with #460, according to venvs mi-app, it uses the same logic for the map

if (p.SCFCManger.isS11()) {
        c = '06tr';
    }
    if (p.SCFCManger.isS12()) {
        c = '06eu';
    }
    if (p.SCFCManger.isT12()) {
        c = '06bk';
    }

@JAKAMI99
Copy link

JAKAMI99 commented May 7, 2024

I got the same vacuum. I sent Piotr a sample of the map!

Would love to see it supported since this robot is really affordable LIDAR one.
Subject is "vacuum.b106bk map sample"

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request new platform
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants