Replies: 1 comment
-
@MaxGhenis asked in issue #2695:
I agree that the separate form (and the notion by some DC taxpayers that they already got a credit for child care expenses via the DC CDCC) could be holding down the take-up of this credit. Also, in reality, maybe the care expenses eligible for the DC KCCATC are less than for the CDCC (because they may be limited to only some subset of care providers). I haven't researched this last possibility, so it is highly speculative. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
The CPS has known issues, but this is surprising since we're so close on the DC CDCC, which uses similar inputs. I just looked through the logic and it seems to capture the law correctly. Maybe because it's on a separate tax form, take-up is much lower? @martinholmer any ideas?
NB: The Tax Expenditure Report refers to the Keep Child Care Affordable Tax Credit by its previous name, the Early Learning Child Credit. But the description aligns with the current policy.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions