You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The following integration test fails. It is not yet known whether the
tax logic problem is in TAXSIM35 or in the current PEUS code, or
whether there are problems in both models. This topic is meant to
facilitate discussion of why this test fails, primarily by reporting
the results of hand calculations required to fill out the relevant tax
form.
- name: Tax unit with taxsimid 90856 in k21.its.csv and k21.ots.csv
absolute_error_margin: 0.01
period: 2021
input:
people:
person1:
age: 64
employment_income: 157010
qualified_dividend_income: 4505.0
taxable_interest_income: 5505.0
short_term_capital_gains: 4505.0
long_term_capital_gains: 3005.0
rental_income: 2005.0
taxable_private_pension_income: 3500.0
social_security_retirement: 10000.0
real_estate_taxes: 6000
mortgage_interest: 2000
self_employment_income: 103010
business_is_qualified: true
business_is_sstb: false
w2_wages_from_qualified_business: 100e6
ssi: 0 # not in TAXSIM35
state_supplement: 0 # not in TAXSIM35
wic: 0 # not in TAXSIM35
ma_covid_19_essential_employee_premium_pay_program: 0 # not in TAXSIM35
person2:
age: 64
employment_income: 6010
qualified_dividend_income: 4505.0
taxable_interest_income: 5505.0
short_term_capital_gains: 4505.0
long_term_capital_gains: 3005.0
rental_income: 2005.0
taxable_private_pension_income: 3500.0
social_security_retirement: 10000.0
ssi: 0 # not in TAXSIM35
state_supplement: 0 # not in TAXSIM35
wic: 0 # not in TAXSIM35
ma_covid_19_essential_employee_premium_pay_program: 0 # not in TAXSIM35
person3:
age: 11
ssi: 0 # not in TAXSIM35
state_supplement: 0 # not in TAXSIM35
wic: 0 # not in TAXSIM35
ma_covid_19_essential_employee_premium_pay_program: 0 # not in TAXSIM35
tax_units:
tax_unit:
members: [person1, person2, person3]
premium_tax_credit: 0 # not in TAXSIM35
local_income_tax: 0 # not in TAXSIM35
state_sales_tax: 0 # not in TAXSIM35
ca_use_tax: 0 # not in TAXSIM35
il_use_tax: 0 # not in TAXSIM35
nm_2021_income_rebate: 0 # not in TAXSIM35
nm_additional_2021_income_rebate: 0 # not in TAXSIM35
nm_supplemental_2021_income_rebate: 0 # not in TAXSIM35
ny_supplemental_eitc: 0 # not in TAXSIM35
ok_use_tax: 0 # not in TAXSIM35
pa_use_tax: 0 # not in TAXSIM35
vt_renter_credit: 0 # not in TAXSIM35
spm_units:
spm_unit:
members: [person1, person2, person3]
snap: 0 # not in TAXSIM35
tanf: 0 # not in TAXSIM35
households:
household:
members: [person1, person2, person3]
state_fips: 5 # AR
output: # expected results from patched TAXSIM35 2024-03-26 version
ar_income_tax: 16529.21
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
The following integration test fails. It is not yet known whether the
tax logic problem is in TAXSIM35 or in the current PEUS code, or
whether there are problems in both models. This topic is meant to
facilitate discussion of why this test fails, primarily by reporting
the results of hand calculations required to fill out the relevant tax
form.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions