Still a draft, detailed differences in this doc.

@hua7450 is this pr supposed to fix old values (FY 2023 and before) or update parameters with FY2024. If its the former, the dates should be fixed from 2024-10-01 to 2023-10-01 and if its the latter most of the states are missing updated values as shown in https://www.fns.usda.gov/snap/eligibility/deduction/standard-utility-allowances

@hua7450 is this pr supposed to fix old values (FY 2023 and before) or update parameters with FY2024. If its the former, the dates should be fixed from 2024-10-01 to 2023-10-01 and if its the latter most of the states are missing updated values as shown in https://www.fns.usda.gov/snap/eligibility/deduction/standard-utility-allowances

It’s the later. I have updated all the 2024 values in the utility folder. Those states that did not have 2024 values have the same values as they have in 2023. 

@hua7450 is this pr supposed to fix old values (FY 2023 and before) or update parameters with FY2024. If its the former, the dates should be fixed from 2024-10-01 to 2023-10-01 and if its the latter most of the states are missing updated values as shown in https://www.fns.usda.gov/snap/eligibility/deduction/standard-utility-allowances

It’s the later. I have updated all the 2024 values in the utility folder. Those states that did not have 2024 values have the same values as they have in 2023.

ok, in that case aren't you missing a ton of values,
for example in water utilities: Alaska = 57, colorado = 69, delaware = 99, DC = 88, etc. or am I misunderstanding? I circled some examples but there are a bunch more

@hua7450 is this pr supposed to fix old values (FY 2023 and before) or update parameters with FY2024. If its the former, the dates should be fixed from 2024-10-01 to 2023-10-01 and if its the latter most of the states are missing updated values as shown in https://www.fns.usda.gov/snap/eligibility/deduction/standard-utility-allowances

It’s the later. I have updated all the 2024 values in the utility folder. Those states that did not have 2024 values have the same values as they have in 2023.

ok, in that case aren't you missing a ton of values, for example in water utilities: Alaska = 57, colorado = 69, delaware = 99, DC = 88, etc. or am I misunderstanding? I circled some examples but there are a bunch more

Yes, I will double-check and add more to it.

@vrathi101 I just checked, I think you are looking at the Excel sheet for FY 2025, USDA recently updated the Excel sheet for utility in October. That's why the values you see are different from mine.

@vrathi101 I just checked, I think you are looking at the Excel sheet for FY 2025, USDA recently updated the Excel sheet for utility in October. That's why the values you see are different from mine.

i see, my bad for that

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 99.00%. Comparing base (cb92a56) to head (5292cde).
Report is 130 commits behind head on master.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #5146      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   99.12%   99.00%   -0.13%     
==========================================
  Files        2592     2613      +21     
  Lines       37707    38068     +361     
  Branches      162      168       +6     
==========================================
+ Hits        37378    37689     +311     
- Misses        297      346      +49     
- Partials       32       33       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@PavelMakarchuk could you please review?