Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Typo in the Angular and Cost Cutting docs - references to capture_pageviews should be updated to capture_pageview #9614

Open
4 of 16 tasks
adampoczatek opened this issue Oct 14, 2024 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #9615
Open
4 of 16 tasks
Assignees

Comments

@adampoczatek
Copy link

Summary

Hi, I noticed a typo in Angular and Cost Cutting docs, your examples refer to capture_pageviews but it should be capture_pageview.

I think these are the only 2 files affected:

  • contents/docs/libraries/angular.md
  • contents/docs/product-analytics/cutting-costs.mdx

What kind of request is this?

  • New docs page / feature
  • Update to existing page

Which product is this for?

  • Product OS (e.g. platform features)
  • Product analytics
  • Session replay
  • Feature flags
  • Experiments
  • Surveys
  • CDP
  • Data warehouse
  • Other (e.g. open source specific)

What's the priority?

  • Urgent AND important ("great scott, this is horribly wrong / out of date")
  • Important, but not urgent ("we need to do this, but not immediately")
  • Non-urgent (this could be better / would be nice to have)

Is there a deadline for this change?

  • Yes (please specify)
  • No
@adampoczatek adampoczatek changed the title {title} Typo in the Angular and Cost Cutting docs - references to capture_pageviews should be updated to capture_pageview Oct 14, 2024
@ivanagas ivanagas linked a pull request Oct 14, 2024 that will close this issue
@ivanagas
Copy link
Contributor

Good catch, thanks! PR on the way: #9615

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants