You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the model we currently use data for pure gas power plants (OCGT and CCGT) from powerplantmatching resulting in a capacity of 6.4 GW and data for KWK Gas Anlagen (central gas CHP) from Marktstammdatenregister resulting in 18.3 GW. So in sum we get 24.7, which is 6-8 GW off.
Own calc for the share of OCGT+CCGT and gas CHP in 2020 are roughly 10 GW and 20 GW. So we are especially missing data from powerplantmatching if we apply the default lifetime of OCGT/CCGT etc. For now, we just scaled the gas capacity to the wished values, which can only be a quick fix.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In 2020, the installed capacity for electricity from gas is something like 30.77 GW (https://ember-energy.org/data/electricity-data-explorer/) or 32.54 GW (https://www.energy-charts.info/charts/installed_power/chart.htm?l=en&c=DE&legendItems=2x4fu&year=2020)
In the model we currently use data for pure gas power plants (OCGT and CCGT) from powerplantmatching resulting in a capacity of 6.4 GW and data for KWK Gas Anlagen (central gas CHP) from Marktstammdatenregister resulting in 18.3 GW. So in sum we get 24.7, which is 6-8 GW off.
Own calc for the share of OCGT+CCGT and gas CHP in 2020 are roughly 10 GW and 20 GW. So we are especially missing data from powerplantmatching if we apply the default lifetime of OCGT/CCGT etc. For now, we just scaled the gas capacity to the wished values, which can only be a quick fix.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: