Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Algorithm for inverse continuous wavelet transform #751

Open
Yecaergi opened this issue Jun 12, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Algorithm for inverse continuous wavelet transform #751

Yecaergi opened this issue Jun 12, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels

Comments

@Yecaergi
Copy link

I would like to take this opportunity to ask you if we have any inverse continuous wavelet transform algorithm that allows us to reconstruct the signal with wavelets, such as daubechies. I did a fairly exhaustive search and this leads me to the icwt algorithm based on the paper by Torrence and compo (1998), which is not implemented for the wavelets we are talking about. Thank you very much for your contributions!

@agriyakhetarpal
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi there, I am not sure if I can help directly but I found a few resources that might be of help:

StackExchange posts

  1. https://dsp.stackexchange.com/questions/87097/why-is-inverse-cwt-inexact-inaccurate
  2. https://stackoverflow.com/questions/21412465/inverse-wavelet-transform-xpost-signalprocessing

Other projects

  1. https://github.com/regeirk/pycwt (seems to be maintained, might not be fully correct without modifications, though: inverse cwt regeirk/pycwt#30
  2. https://github.com/duducosmos/kPyWavelet (old and unmaintained, likely broken because it uses easy_install)

@Yecaergi
Copy link
Author

Thank you @agriyakhetarpal ! I was reading the documentation and contributions that you suggest, but they are the same ones that I had seen a while ago. I see that an algorithm for the icwt has not yet been implemented for wavelets other than Morlet, Paul, DOG and Mexican Hat, that is, those used by Torrence and Compo.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants