You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The current pseudopotential schema, v.0.99, is implemented in the upflib/ library. It requires some testing of course, but it should more or less work both in writing (write_upf_new.f90) and in reading (read_upf_new.f90) codes. The upfconv.f90 utility should also work. The schema for the GIPAW section should however be slightly modified (see also the FIXME's in read_upf_new.f90):
pp_gipaw_core_orbital
pp_gipaw_orbital
should be preceded by, or included into, a tag containing the information on the number or respective orbitals. This would make reading the xml file in a SAX style, as done by the xmltools.f90 utilities, much easier.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
the two sections were already in the schema, just I omitted to write them, probably planning to remove them from the schema.
to spare two tags we could turn these two elements as attributes. What do you think ?
The current pseudopotential schema, v.0.99, is implemented in the upflib/ library. It requires some testing of course, but it should more or less work both in writing (write_upf_new.f90) and in reading (read_upf_new.f90) codes. The upfconv.f90 utility should also work. The schema for the GIPAW section should however be slightly modified (see also the FIXME's in read_upf_new.f90):
should be preceded by, or included into, a tag containing the information on the number or respective orbitals. This would make reading the xml file in a SAX style, as done by the xmltools.f90 utilities, much easier.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: